On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:13:01AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2014, Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> wrote: > > On 13.05.2014 22:24, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> On Tue, 13 May 2014 16:50:12 +0100 > >> Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:07:37PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>>> This matches the algorithm used by earlier kernels when selecting the > >>>> mode for the fbcon. And only if there is no modes at all, do we fall > >>>> back to using the BIOS configuration. Seamless transition is still > >>>> preserved (from the BIOS configuration to ours) so long as the BIOS has > >>>> also chosen what we hope is the native configuration. > >>>> > >>>> Reported-by: Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> > >>>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78655 > >>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > >>>> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > > > I don't think that Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org is necessary, kernels up > > to 3.14.x don't expose the problem. And as this fixes a post-3.14 > > regression this is a clear candidate for 3.15 > > Chris, do we drop cc: stable?
The switch-over was in 3.15, then yes the regression is only limited to 3.15 -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
