On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 04:07:37PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > This matches the algorithm used by earlier kernels when selecting the > mode for the fbcon. And only if there is no modes at all, do we fall > back to using the BIOS configuration. Seamless transition is still > preserved (from the BIOS configuration to ours) so long as the BIOS has > also chosen what we hope is the native configuration. > > Reported-by: Knut Petersen <knut_peter...@t-online.de> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78655 > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c > index 1d3f0a9cce31..05beec4badd5 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c > @@ -397,6 +397,14 @@ static bool intel_fb_initial_config(struct drm_fb_helper > *fb_helper, > height); > } > > + /* No preferred mode marked by the EDID? Are there any modes? */ > + if (!modes[i] && !list_empty(&connector->modes)) { > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("using first mode listed on connector > %s\n", > + drm_get_connector_name(connector)); > + modes[i] = list_first_entry(struct drm_display_mode, > + &connector->modes, head);
Please imagine that I wrote this correctly. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
