On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 04:49:30PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Jani Nikula > > <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Jani Nikula > >>> <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >>>> If this is for testing only, and the module parameter does not quite cut > >>>> it, please add it to debugfs. That we can pretty much change at will. > >>> > >>> If I understand correctly, you are suggesting that the on/off knob > >>> live in debugfs. So, should the module param in sysfs mirror this > >>> debugfs knob? > >> > >> I guess the simplest thing to move forward would be something to update > >> psr state after the module parameter has been changed, although it's > >> perhaps a bit clumsy to use. > > > > Couldn't understand. May be an example to illustrate what you are saying? > > echo 1 > /sys/module/i915/parameters/enable_psr > echo something > sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_update > > where that debugfs file essentially calls intel_edp_psr_update() on > update. > > I guess it could be i915_edp_psr_enable and echoing there would modify > the module parameter and call update. With debugfs I'm not so fussy.
Whatever the interface I think it might be nice to allow you to force the mode of PSR operation (main link off vs. standby). -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
