On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Jani Nikula > <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Jani Nikula >>> <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote: >>>> If this is for testing only, and the module parameter does not quite cut >>>> it, please add it to debugfs. That we can pretty much change at will. >>> >>> If I understand correctly, you are suggesting that the on/off knob >>> live in debugfs. So, should the module param in sysfs mirror this >>> debugfs knob? >> >> I guess the simplest thing to move forward would be something to update >> psr state after the module parameter has been changed, although it's >> perhaps a bit clumsy to use. > > Couldn't understand. May be an example to illustrate what you are saying?
echo 1 > /sys/module/i915/parameters/enable_psr echo something > sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_update where that debugfs file essentially calls intel_edp_psr_update() on update. I guess it could be i915_edp_psr_enable and echoing there would modify the module parameter and call update. With debugfs I'm not so fussy. Jani. > > Thanks, > Siva Chandra -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
