On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 07:46:38PM -0200, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Update XY_COLOR_BLT command for Broadwell.
> 
> v2: stash devid and remove ugly double allocation. (by Chris).
> v3: fix inverted blt command size and stash fd, devid and intel_gen.
> 
> Cc: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tests/gem_gtt_hog.c | 59 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/gem_gtt_hog.c b/tests/gem_gtt_hog.c
> index 53cd7eb..3149ff4 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_gtt_hog.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_gtt_hog.c
> @@ -44,30 +44,43 @@
>  
>  static const uint32_t canary = 0xdeadbeef;
>  
> +typedef struct data {
> +     int fd;
> +     int devid;
> +     int intel_gen;
> +} data_t;
> +
>  static double elapsed(const struct timeval *start,
>                     const struct timeval *end)
>  {
>       return 1e6*(end->tv_sec - start->tv_sec) + (end->tv_usec - 
> start->tv_usec);
>  }
>  
> -static void busy(int fd, uint32_t handle, int size, int loops)
> +static void busy(data_t *data, uint32_t handle, int size, int loops)
>  {
>       struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry reloc[20];
>       struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 gem_exec[2];
>       struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 execbuf;
>       struct drm_i915_gem_pwrite gem_pwrite;
>       struct drm_i915_gem_create create;
> -     uint32_t buf[122], *b;
> -     int i;
> +     uint32_t buf[170], *b;
> +     int i, b_size;
>  
>       memset(reloc, 0, sizeof(reloc));
>       memset(gem_exec, 0, sizeof(gem_exec));
>       memset(&execbuf, 0, sizeof(execbuf));
>  
>       b = buf;
> +     b_size = sizeof(uint32_t) * (data->intel_gen >= 8 ? 170 : 122);
>       for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
> -             *b++ = XY_COLOR_BLT_CMD_NOLEN | 4 |
> -                     COLOR_BLT_WRITE_ALPHA | XY_COLOR_BLT_WRITE_RGB;
> +             if (data->intel_gen >= 8) {
> +                     *b++ = MI_NOOP;

Not required, instead you just round up the buf to the next qword after
ending the batch.

> +                     *b++ = XY_COLOR_BLT_CMD_NOLEN | 5 |
> +                             COLOR_BLT_WRITE_ALPHA | XY_COLOR_BLT_WRITE_RGB;
> +             } else {
> +                     *b++ = XY_COLOR_BLT_CMD_NOLEN | 4 |
> +                             COLOR_BLT_WRITE_ALPHA | XY_COLOR_BLT_WRITE_RGB;
> +             }
>               *b++ = 0xf0 << 16 | 1 << 25 | 1 << 24 | 4096;
>               *b++ = 0;
>               *b++ = size >> 12 << 16 | 1024;
> @@ -76,6 +89,8 @@ static void busy(int fd, uint32_t handle, int size, int 
> loops)
>               reloc[i].read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
>               reloc[i].write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_RENDER;
>               *b++ = 0;
> +             if (data->intel_gen >= 8)
> +                     *b++ = 0;
>               *b++ = canary;
>       }
>       *b++ = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
if ((b - buf) & 1))
 *b++ = 0;

> @@ -86,56 +101,55 @@ static void busy(int fd, uint32_t handle, int size, int 
> loops)
>  
>       create.handle = 0;
>       create.size = 4096;
> -     drmIoctl(fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CREATE, &create);
> +     drmIoctl(data->fd, DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_CREATE, &create);
>       gem_exec[1].handle = create.handle;
>       gem_exec[1].relocation_count = 20;
>       gem_exec[1].relocs_ptr = (uintptr_t)reloc;
>  
>       execbuf.buffers_ptr = (uintptr_t)gem_exec;
>       execbuf.buffer_count = 2;
> -     execbuf.batch_len = sizeof(buf);
> +     execbuf.batch_len = b_size;

I would have personally used (b - buf) * sizeof(buf[0]);

>       execbuf.flags = 1 << 11;
> -     if (HAS_BLT_RING(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)))
> +     if (HAS_BLT_RING(data->devid))
>               execbuf.flags |= I915_EXEC_BLT;
>  
>       gem_pwrite.handle = gem_exec[1].handle;
>       gem_pwrite.offset = 0;
> -     gem_pwrite.size = sizeof(buf);
> +     gem_pwrite.size = b_size;
and gem_pwrite.size = execbuf.batch_len;
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to