On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 11:40:41AM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> In terms of async flip optimization we don't to allocate
> extra ddb space, so lets skip it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovs...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 0b45d1d61d0f..e1594f43bb1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -5245,9 +5245,15 @@ skl_allocate_plane_ddb(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state,
> break;
>
> rate = crtc_state->plane_data_rate[plane_id];
> - extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> - DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> - total_data_rate));
> +
> + if (IS_DG2(dev_priv) && crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
We should have a sensible function for this.
> + extra = 0;
Aren't we going to get the WARN(alloc_size != 0) if this
is the only enabled plane?
> + } else {
> + extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> + DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> + total_data_rate));
> + }
> +
> total[plane_id] = wm->wm[level].min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> alloc_size -= extra;
> total_data_rate -= rate;
> @@ -5256,9 +5262,15 @@ skl_allocate_plane_ddb(struct intel_atomic_state
> *state,
> break;
>
> rate = crtc_state->uv_plane_data_rate[plane_id];
> - extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> - DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> - total_data_rate));
> +
> + if (IS_DG2(dev_priv) && crtc_state->uapi.async_flip) {
> + extra = 0;
> + } else {
> + extra = min_t(u16, alloc_size,
> + DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(alloc_size * rate,
> + total_data_rate));
> + }
> +
> uv_total[plane_id] = wm->uv_wm[level].min_ddb_alloc + extra;
> alloc_size -= extra;
> total_data_rate -= rate;
> --
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
