From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Return UINT_MAX for the calculated WM level if the latency is zero.
This will lead to marking the WM level as disabled.
I'm not sure if latency==0 should mean that we want to disable the
level. But that's the implication I got from the fact that we don't
even enable the watermark code of the SSKDP register is 0.
v2: Use WARN() to scare people
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 53967ef..149eb0a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2116,6 +2116,9 @@ static uint32_t ilk_wm_method1(uint32_t pixel_rate,
uint8_t bytes_per_pixel,
{
uint64_t ret;
+ if (WARN(latency == 0, "Latency value missing\n"))
+ return UINT_MAX;
+
ret = (uint64_t) pixel_rate * bytes_per_pixel * latency;
ret = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ret, 64 * 10000) + 2;
@@ -2128,6 +2131,9 @@ static uint32_t ilk_wm_method2(uint32_t pixel_rate,
uint32_t pipe_htotal,
{
uint32_t ret;
+ if (WARN(latency == 0, "Latency value missing\n"))
+ return UINT_MAX;
+
ret = (latency * pixel_rate) / (pipe_htotal * 10000);
ret = (ret + 1) * horiz_pixels * bytes_per_pixel;
ret = DIV_ROUND_UP(ret, 64) + 2;
--
1.8.1.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
