On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 01:00:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 12:42:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Tue, 06 Oct 2020, Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> wrote:
> >> > +static bool gen11_dsi_initial_fastset_check(struct intel_encoder
> >> > *encoder,
> >> > + struct intel_crtc_state
> >> > *crtc_state)
> >> > +{
> >> > + if (crtc_state->dsc.compression_enable) {
> >> > + drm_dbg_kms(encoder->base.dev, "Forcing full modeset
> >> > due to DSC being enabled\n");
> >> > + crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true;
> >>
> >> Just musing... if it's a *check*, why do we pass in a non-const
> >> crtc_state and modify it here?
> >>
> >> Would it not be cleaner to pass in const crtc_state and set
> >> crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed in the caller based on the return value?
> >
> > The encoder can update the *_changed flags in crtc_state depending on
> > what is preventing a fastset.
>
> Okay... is this a good design? ;)
That's how atomic_check hooks work..
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
