Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Check for integer overflow in the priority chain, rather than against a
> type-constricted max-priority check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> index 94854a467e66..3e042fa4b94b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
> @@ -2735,12 +2735,12 @@ static int live_preempt_gang(void *arg)
>                       /* Submit each spinner at increasing priority */
>                       engine->schedule(rq, &attr);
>  
> +                     if (prio < attr.priority)
> +                             break;
> +
>                       if (prio <= I915_PRIORITY_MAX)
>                               continue;
>  
> -                     if (prio > (INT_MAX >> I915_USER_PRIORITY_SHIFT))
> -                             break;
> -
>                       if (__igt_timeout(end_time, NULL))
>                               break;
>               } while (1);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to