On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:01:34PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
>
> Quick fixup to the test so correct way of iterating the static engine list
> is used. More comprehensive fixes to the test are in progress.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latv...@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c
> index 6aa27133cbb7..8b72a16ad86f 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c
> @@ -857,6 +857,7 @@ static unsigned int __has_context_isolation(int fd)
> igt_main
> {
> unsigned int has_context_isolation = 0;
> + const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
> int fd = -1;
>
> igt_fixture {
> @@ -876,8 +877,7 @@ igt_main
> igt_skip_on(gen > LAST_KNOWN_GEN);
> }
>
> - for (const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e = intel_execution_engines2;
> - e->name; e++) {
> + __for_each_static_engine(e) {
> igt_subtest_group {
> igt_fixture {
> igt_require(has_context_isolation & (1 <<
> e->class));
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
