From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Quick fixup to the test so correct way of iterating the static engine list
is used. More comprehensive fixes to the test are in progress.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c
index 6aa27133cbb7..8b72a16ad86f 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_isolation.c
@@ -857,6 +857,7 @@ static unsigned int __has_context_isolation(int fd)
igt_main
{
unsigned int has_context_isolation = 0;
+ const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
int fd = -1;
igt_fixture {
@@ -876,8 +877,7 @@ igt_main
igt_skip_on(gen > LAST_KNOWN_GEN);
}
- for (const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e = intel_execution_engines2;
- e->name; e++) {
+ __for_each_static_engine(e) {
igt_subtest_group {
igt_fixture {
igt_require(has_context_isolation & (1 <<
e->class));
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
