On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 02:30:56PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 05:59:20PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > @@ -2720,12 +2720,12 @@ static void gen6_enable_rps(struct drm_device *dev)
> >     gen6_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, (gt_perf_status & 0xff00) >> 8);
> >  
> >     /* requires MSI enabled */
> > -   I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIER, GEN6_PM_DEFERRED_EVENTS);
> > +   I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIER, I915_READ(GEN6_PMIER) | GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS);
> >     spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->rps.lock);
> >     WARN_ON(dev_priv->rps.pm_iir != 0);
> > -   I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, 0);
> > +   I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIIR, GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS);
> 
> You're not unmasking the RPS interrupts in PMIMR here now. I'm missing
> how they are enabled now.

You are right. It's fixed in a later patch IFF we have VEBOX, but would
regress on IVB and HSW. Both this patch, and that are easily fixed. BRB.

> 
> >     spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->rps.lock); - /* enable all PM
> >     interrupts */ + /* unmask all PM interrupts */
> >     I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, 0);
> >
> >     rc6vids = 0;

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to