On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 10:15:55PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2019-04-18 21:53:41)
> > The plan is to consolidate all IRQ related stuff together
> > under the new intel_irq.
> > 
> > So let's continue with RPS stuff.
> 
> Nah, this is the wrong direction

you mean just this rps moving to intel_irq?
or the whole idea of intel_irq is bad in your opinion?

> as we don't have to pull this under a
> more global lock but push it under a local one.

yeap, I noticed this big lock around everything and
that we need to reduce that indeed...


> If you are touching this
> code, you could review the bug fixes first... :)

:(

Thanks a lot,
Rodrigo.

> -Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to