Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-02-15 15:21:11) >> Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: >> >> > Since we no longer need to hold struct_mutex to perform a global device >> > reset, don't do so for igt_reset_wedge(). >> > >> >> Oh but the interesting question is not about need, but should =) >> Do it both ways? > > Just doing it without should be enough for lockdep, and specifically > remember to guard everything with lockdep_assert_held() when required. > The reverse case of testing with it held can only prove a deadlock by > hitting it! (At which point CI reboots the machine.)
Not much value to prove that the old model works with new rules, Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com> _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
