Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: > Since we no longer need to hold struct_mutex to perform a global device > reset, don't do so for igt_reset_wedge(). >
Oh but the interesting question is not about need, but should =) Do it both ways? -Mika > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c > index f75cb56ff8ad..57e02840be9e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_hangcheck.c > @@ -399,10 +399,8 @@ static int igt_wedged_reset(void *arg) > > i915_gem_set_wedged(i915); > > - mutex_lock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex); > GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_terminally_wedged(&i915->gpu_error)); > i915_reset(i915, ALL_ENGINES, NULL); > - mutex_unlock(&i915->drm.struct_mutex); > > intel_runtime_pm_put(i915, wakeref); > igt_global_reset_unlock(i915); > -- > 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
