On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 04:21:32PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Now that intel_lvds_init() is only called for platforms that might have
>> LVDS, move the remaining checks to intel_setup_outputs(), again similar
>> to other outputs, and remove the overlapping checks.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |  6 ++++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c    | 23 -----------------------
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> index 4b5704a87934..4207ee0b83ce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> @@ -14464,7 +14464,8 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>
> Had to read the earlier patch twice to make sure we're not leaving
> ibx/cpt/ppt or pnv behind.
>
>>      } else if (IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 3, 4)) {
>>              bool found = false;
>>  
>> -            intel_lvds_init(dev_priv);
>> +            if (IS_MOBILE(dev_priv))
>> +                    intel_lvds_init(dev_priv);
>>  
>>              if (dev_priv->vbt.int_crt_support)
>>                      intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
>> @@ -14501,7 +14502,8 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct 
>> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>              if (IS_G4X(dev_priv) && (I915_READ(DP_D) & DP_DETECTED))
>>                      intel_dp_init(dev_priv, DP_D, PORT_D);
>>      } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 2)) {
>> -            intel_lvds_init(dev_priv);
>> +            if (IS_MOBILE(dev_priv) && !IS_I830(dev_priv))
>
> aka. IS_I85X()

Made the change in a separate patch.

> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

Thanks,
Jani.


>
>> +                    intel_lvds_init(dev_priv);
>>  
>>              if (dev_priv->vbt.int_crt_support)
>>                      intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
>> index 46a5dfd5cdf7..815ed463d9c5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
>> @@ -798,26 +798,6 @@ static bool compute_is_dual_link_lvds(struct 
>> intel_lvds_encoder *lvds_encoder)
>>      return (val & LVDS_CLKB_POWER_MASK) == LVDS_CLKB_POWER_UP;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static bool intel_lvds_supported(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> -{
>> -    /*
>> -     * With the introduction of the PCH we gained a dedicated
>> -     * LVDS presence pin, use it.
>> -     */
>> -    if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv))
>> -            return true;
>> -
>> -    /*
>> -     * Otherwise LVDS was only attached to mobile products,
>> -     * except for the inglorious 830gm
>> -     */
>> -    if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 4 &&
>> -        IS_MOBILE(dev_priv) && !IS_I830(dev_priv))
>> -            return true;
>> -
>> -    return false;
>> -}
>> -
>>  /**
>>   * intel_lvds_init - setup LVDS connectors on this device
>>   * @dev_priv: i915 device
>> @@ -842,9 +822,6 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>>      u8 pin;
>>      u32 allowed_scalers;
>>  
>> -    if (!intel_lvds_supported(dev_priv))
>> -            return;
>> -
>>      /* Skip init on machines we know falsely report LVDS */
>>      if (dmi_check_system(intel_no_lvds)) {
>>              WARN(!dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support,
>> -- 
>> 2.20.1
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Intel-gfx mailing list
>> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to