On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 04:21:32PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Now that intel_lvds_init() is only called for platforms that might have
> LVDS, move the remaining checks to intel_setup_outputs(), again similar
> to other outputs, and remove the overlapping checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 23 -----------------------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 4b5704a87934..4207ee0b83ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -14464,7 +14464,8 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
Had to read the earlier patch twice to make sure we're not leaving
ibx/cpt/ppt or pnv behind.
> } else if (IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 3, 4)) {
> bool found = false;
>
> - intel_lvds_init(dev_priv);
> + if (IS_MOBILE(dev_priv))
> + intel_lvds_init(dev_priv);
>
> if (dev_priv->vbt.int_crt_support)
> intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
> @@ -14501,7 +14502,8 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> if (IS_G4X(dev_priv) && (I915_READ(DP_D) & DP_DETECTED))
> intel_dp_init(dev_priv, DP_D, PORT_D);
> } else if (IS_GEN(dev_priv, 2)) {
> - intel_lvds_init(dev_priv);
> + if (IS_MOBILE(dev_priv) && !IS_I830(dev_priv))
aka. IS_I85X()
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> + intel_lvds_init(dev_priv);
>
> if (dev_priv->vbt.int_crt_support)
> intel_crt_init(dev_priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> index 46a5dfd5cdf7..815ed463d9c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
> @@ -798,26 +798,6 @@ static bool compute_is_dual_link_lvds(struct
> intel_lvds_encoder *lvds_encoder)
> return (val & LVDS_CLKB_POWER_MASK) == LVDS_CLKB_POWER_UP;
> }
>
> -static bool intel_lvds_supported(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - /*
> - * With the introduction of the PCH we gained a dedicated
> - * LVDS presence pin, use it.
> - */
> - if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev_priv) || HAS_PCH_CPT(dev_priv))
> - return true;
> -
> - /*
> - * Otherwise LVDS was only attached to mobile products,
> - * except for the inglorious 830gm
> - */
> - if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 4 &&
> - IS_MOBILE(dev_priv) && !IS_I830(dev_priv))
> - return true;
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * intel_lvds_init - setup LVDS connectors on this device
> * @dev_priv: i915 device
> @@ -842,9 +822,6 @@ void intel_lvds_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> u8 pin;
> u32 allowed_scalers;
>
> - if (!intel_lvds_supported(dev_priv))
> - return;
> -
> /* Skip init on machines we know falsely report LVDS */
> if (dmi_check_system(intel_no_lvds)) {
> WARN(!dev_priv->vbt.int_lvds_support,
> --
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
