On 19/12/2017 21:45, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-12-19 15:45:42)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Rather than calibrate and emit nop batches, use a manually signalled chain
of spinners to generate the desired interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
- /* Unplug the calibrated queue and wait for all the fences */
- igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
- igt_assert_eq(poll(&pfd, 1, 2 * test_duration_ms), 1);
- close(pfd.fd);
+ pfd.fd = spin[i]->out_fence;
+ igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin[i], timeout_ms * 1e6);
+ igt_assert_eq(poll(&pfd, 1, 2 * timeout_ms), 1);
Oh, still with the synchronous behaviour, bleurgh.
I was attracted by the simplicity of this approach, but I can change to
set incremental timeouts and keep the merged fence if you think that's
better?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
