Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-12-19 15:45:42) > From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > Rather than calibrate and emit nop batches, use a manually signalled chain > of spinners to generate the desired interrupts. > > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > --- > - /* Unplug the calibrated queue and wait for all the fences */ > - igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin); > - igt_assert_eq(poll(&pfd, 1, 2 * test_duration_ms), 1); > - close(pfd.fd); > + pfd.fd = spin[i]->out_fence; > + igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin[i], timeout_ms * 1e6); > + igt_assert_eq(poll(&pfd, 1, 2 * timeout_ms), 1);
Oh, still with the synchronous behaviour, bleurgh. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
