On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:18:12AM +0000, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 04:47:08PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 08:48:22PM +0000, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Track the system agent voltage we request from pcode in the cdclk state
> > > on SKL/KBL/CFL. Annoyingly we can't actually read out the current value 
> > > since
> > > there's no pcode command to do that, so we'll have to just assume that
> > > it worked.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kah...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 40 
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > > index 7442e9443ffa..6f7b5abe6e3f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > > @@ -789,6 +789,24 @@ static int skl_calc_cdclk(int min_cdclk, int vco)
> > >   }
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static u8 skl_calc_voltage(int cdclk)
> > > +{
> > > + switch (cdclk) {
> > > + default:
> > > + case 308571:
> > > + case 337500:
> > > +         return 0;
> > > + case 450000:
> > > + case 432000:
> > > +         return 1;
> > > + case 540000:
> > > +         return 2;
> > > + case 617143:
> > > + case 675000:
> > > +         return 3;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void skl_dpll0_update(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >                        struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -839,7 +857,7 @@ static void skl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> > > *dev_priv,
> > >   cdclk_state->cdclk = cdclk_state->ref;
> > >  
> > >   if (cdclk_state->vco == 0)
> > > -         return;
> > > +         goto out;
> > 
> > why do we need this case?
> 
> Mainly just to make sure the entire state is consistent.

thanks.
I don't see why not, so

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>



> 
> > 
> > >  
> > >   cdctl = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL);
> > >  
> > > @@ -880,6 +898,13 @@ static void skl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> > > *dev_priv,
> > >                   break;
> > >           }
> > >   }
> > > +
> > > + out:
> > > + /*
> > > +  * Can't read this out :( Let's assume it's
> > > +  * at least what the CDCLK frequency requires.
> > > +  */
> > > + cdclk_state->voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state->cdclk);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  /* convert from kHz to .1 fixpoint MHz with -1MHz offset */
> > > @@ -964,7 +989,7 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> > > *dev_priv,
> > >  {
> > >   int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
> > >   int vco = cdclk_state->vco;
> > > - u32 freq_select, pcu_ack;
> > > + u32 freq_select;
> > >   int ret;
> > >  
> > >   mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> > > @@ -988,21 +1013,17 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> > > *dev_priv,
> > >   case 308571:
> > >   case 337500:
> > >           freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_337_308;
> > > -         pcu_ack = 0;
> > >           break;
> > >   case 450000:
> > >   case 432000:
> > >           freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_450_432;
> > > -         pcu_ack = 1;
> > >           break;
> > >   case 540000:
> > >           freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_540;
> > > -         pcu_ack = 2;
> > >           break;
> > >   case 617143:
> > >   case 675000:
> > >           freq_select = CDCLK_FREQ_675_617;
> > > -         pcu_ack = 3;
> > >           break;
> > >   }
> > >  
> > > @@ -1018,7 +1039,8 @@ static void skl_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> > > *dev_priv,
> > >  
> > >   /* inform PCU of the change */
> > >   mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> > > - sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL, pcu_ack);
> > > + sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> > > +                         cdclk_state->voltage);
> > >   mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> > >  
> > >   intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> > > @@ -1097,6 +1119,7 @@ void skl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> > > *dev_priv)
> > >   if (cdclk_state.vco == 0)
> > >           cdclk_state.vco = 8100000;
> > >   cdclk_state.cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, cdclk_state.vco);
> > > + cdclk_state.voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
> > >  
> > >   skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1114,6 +1137,7 @@ void skl_uninit_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private 
> > > *dev_priv)
> > >  
> > >   cdclk_state.cdclk = cdclk_state.ref;
> > >   cdclk_state.vco = 0;
> > > + cdclk_state.voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
> > >  
> > >   skl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1970,12 +1994,14 @@ static int skl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct 
> > > drm_atomic_state *state)
> > >  
> > >   intel_state->cdclk.logical.vco = vco;
> > >   intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
> > > + intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
> > >  
> > >   if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
> > >           cdclk = skl_calc_cdclk(0, vco);
> > >  
> > >           intel_state->cdclk.actual.vco = vco;
> > >           intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
> > > +         intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage = skl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
> > >   } else {
> > >           intel_state->cdclk.actual =
> > >                   intel_state->cdclk.logical;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.13.6
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to