From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0
doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/kms_flip.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_flip.c b/tests/kms_flip.c
index acec95f0de72..9a96566edb67 100644
--- a/tests/kms_flip.c
+++ b/tests/kms_flip.c
@@ -1159,7 +1159,7 @@ static void calibrate_ts(struct test_output *o, int
crtc_idx)
memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait));
wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx);
- wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
+ wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait));
last_seq = wait.reply.sequence;
--
2.13.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
