From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
Asking for the initial vblank count by specifying and absolute vblank count of 0
doesn't make much sense. Switch to a relative query instead.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
tests/kms_setmode.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tests/kms_setmode.c b/tests/kms_setmode.c
index 206d360607bb..ed5d97442255 100644
--- a/tests/kms_setmode.c
+++ b/tests/kms_setmode.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static void check_timings(int crtc_idx, const
drmModeModeInfo *kmode)
memset(&wait, 0, sizeof(wait));
wait.request.type = kmstest_get_vbl_flag(crtc_idx);
- wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_ABSOLUTE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
+ wait.request.type |= DRM_VBLANK_RELATIVE | DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS;
do_or_die(drmWaitVBlank(drm_fd, &wait));
last_seq = wait.reply.sequence;
--
2.13.5
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
