On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 07:51:16PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:41:39PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Or we can push this wait to where it can interrupt, such as > > prepare_planes_fb. > > (For intel_atomic_commit_tail, intel_crtc_disable_noatomic() should always > > be a no-op.) And then we are down to just the shrinker running > > uninterruptibly, just one last place to fix. > > Hmm. Yeah I guess we could try to do this in a different place.
If we do the intel_overlay_off() via mmio (rather than CS) that makes it simpler, as we just have to wait for the prior operation. I'm not imagining that we can just use mmio, right? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
