On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 08:11:33PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:56:47PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > The i915_gem_active stuff doesn't like a NULL ->retire hook, but
> > the overlay code can set it to NULL. That obviously ends up oopsing.
> > Fix it by introducing a new helper to assign the retirement callback
> > that will switch out the NULL function pointer with
> > i915_gem_retire_noop.
> >
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > Fixes: 0d9bdd886f29 ("drm/i915: Convert intel_overlay to request tracking")
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>
> lgtm, feel free to put yourself as the author is you want.
>
> BTW I don't think we ever call the init_foo() thing on last_flip.
> Should be do that in overlay_init() or some such place?
Eeek. yes, we are missing the init_request_active() as well. A trivial
patch to add it to overlay_init, gratefully r-b'ed.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
