On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 04:03:02PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The only time irq_get should fail is during unload or suspend. Both of
> these points should try to quiesce the GPU before disabling interrupts
> and so the atomic polling should never occur.
> 
> This was recommended by Chris Wilson as a way of reducing added
> complexity to the polled wait which I introduced in an RFC patch.
> 
> 09:57 < ickle_> it's only there as a fudge for waiting after irqs
> after uninstalled during s&r, we aren't actually meant to hit it
> 09:57 < ickle_> so maybe we should just kill the code there and fix the 
> breakage
> 
> v2: return -ENODEV instead of -EBUSY when irq_get fails
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net>
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to