On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:53:55 +0200 Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:22:09PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:58:03 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> > > wrote: > > > Both PCH and CPU eDP are DP, so set the is_dp flag to true. Add > > > is_cpu_edp and is_pch_edp bools to make checking for each less verbose > > > (rather than has_edp_encoder && !intel_encoder_is_pch_edp() sprinkled > > > everywhere). And rename the "has_edp_encoder" variable to just > > > "edp_encoder". > > > > > > With the above variables cleaned up, the rest of the code becomes a bit > > > more readable and clear. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> > > > > Ok, that took quite a bit of reading to be sure that the changes were > > consistent. Unfortunately it also looks to be in its simplest form. > > > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. I don't know what to do with the > other two patches, are they supposed to be for -fixes? I don't think they're urgent enough for -fixes. They're still just fixing issues on my IVB SDV. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
