On 02/21/2012 01:11 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:59:37 -0800, Kenneth Graunke<kenn...@whitecape.org>  
wrote:
@@ -1828,6 +1829,9 @@ drm_intel_gem_bo_mrb_exec2(drm_intel_bo *bo, int used,
        execbuf.rsvd1 = 0;
        execbuf.rsvd2 = 0;

+       if (getenv("INTEL_DEVID_OVERRIDE"))
+               goto skip_execution;

I'm not thrilled about calling getenv() for every execbuffer.

Good point.  I'll have to fix that.

And what about the original execbuffer path?
-Chris

Does anybody care?  I'm not even sure how I'd test it.

A little bit of background: this is a stepping stone on the way to simulator support.

When INTEL_DEVID_OVERRIDE is set, Mesa will generate code/batches for that system, rather than the current machine. It also implicitly sets INTEL_NO_HW=1, which makes it avoid calling execbuf2. This at least allows INTEL_DEBUG=vs,wm,bat style dumps, which is handy.

However, our .aub trace file support is in libdrm, so I need Mesa to execbuf, or I don't get aub file dumps. But I don't want libdrm to -actually- exec it.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to