On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:59:38 -0800, Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>
A task for a rainy afternoon would be to rigorously use the verbose PCI_ID_* names rather than the raw values. Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > --- > intel/intel_chipset.h | 2 -- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/intel/intel_chipset.h b/intel/intel_chipset.h > index e3a30fc..1b6e357 100644 > --- a/intel/intel_chipset.h > +++ b/intel/intel_chipset.h > @@ -96,8 +96,6 @@ > dev == 0x2E22 || \ > dev == 0x2E32 || \ > dev == 0x2E42 || \ Note that these 5 IDs are part of IS_G4X, can you kill them as well (in another patch). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
