On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:41:11 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > The locking in our setup and teardown paths is rather arbitrary, but > generally we try to protect gem stuff with dev->struct_mutex. Further, > the ums/gem ioctl to setup gem _does_ take the look. So fix up this > benign inconsistency.
It is completely arbitrary and only exists to keep lockdep and various BUG_ON(mutex_lock) happy. From your reading, we would have a lockdep warning with ums/gem? The extra little step towards consistency is likely to save a warning later, so Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
