On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:11:53 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> With the new ducttape of much finer quality, this seems to be no > longer necessary. > > Tested on my ivb and snb machine with the usual suspects of testcases. Eric suggested that unless we have evidence that the new work-around fixes bugs on SNB, that we should continue to use the HWSTAM work-around on that chip and use the RC6 voodoo on IVB, thus not potentially causing regressions on SNB. For back-porting to older kernels, that's obviously the right plan. I think it's also the right plan for newer kernels, but I'd love to hear alternate views on the matter. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpqMqxAacKmx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
