On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 05:39:44PM +0100, Nicolas Kalkhof wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > confirmed. Linus's linux-next.git shows the same behaviour. Until now > I've used a patched 3.1-rc-6+ Kernel from Dave Airlie's branch > (git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux' from Oct 26th.). > dmesg/syslog shows nothing special, neither does i915_error_state. > > Any advice?
If the behaviour-difference is clear, you could try to bisect this. The alternative is to use your favourite system profiler and see where the cycles get wasted (either sysprof or perf). I suggest you'll try whatever approach your more familiar with first and then switch over to the other if the first one doesn't yield any clear results. If the difference is really clear, I'd start with the bisect (aside: don't restrict the bisect to any subdir, the change causing the regression could equally likely be somewhere in the core kernel). Yours, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
