Hi Daniel, confirmed. Linus's linux-next.git shows the same behaviour. Until now I've used a patched 3.1-rc-6+ Kernel from Dave Airlie's branch (git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux' from Oct 26th.). dmesg/syslog shows nothing special, neither does i915_error_state.
Any advice? Nic -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: "Daniel Vetter" <dan...@ffwll.ch> Gesendet: Nov 7, 2011 5:05:12 PM An: "Nicolas Kalkhof" <nkalk...@web.de> Betreff: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: protect force_wake_(get|put) with the gt_lock >On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 02:52:06PM +0100, Nicolas Kalkhof wrote: >> Hi Daniel, >> >> thanks for the git branch. Strange thing is with the patched kernel the >> cpu load goes up after working with my desktop with no obvious reason. >> top shows a high user and system load but no process using up all the >> cpu cores. The cpufreq-daemon clocks the cpu cores down to the minimal >> frequency (800mhz) when idle while top still shows full cpu load but no >> process using up the cpu. The cpu load drops to normal after I kill X >> and immediately goes up again if I restart X. >> >> I'm kinda lost here :( Any Ideas? > >Step one is to check whether -linus master has the same issues. My branch >is based upon > >commit 37be944a0270402f9cda291a930b0286f6dc92f5 >Merge: ca836a2 1717c0e >Author: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org> >Date: Fri Oct 28 05:54:23 2011 -0700 > > Merge branch 'drm-core-next' of > git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux' > >If that doesn't show the same issue, can you please run a bisect (only 13 >commits) to find out which patch introduced this? > >Thanks, Daniel >-- >Daniel Vetter >Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch >Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 ___________________________________________________________ SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=021192 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
