On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:55:00 -0700, Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote: > > Get some more useful info for debugging backtraces on forcewake > > problems. Appropriate debug flags will be required for the drm module. > > Wouldn't it be neater to pass the reg down to > gen6_gt_force_wake_get() so that we only have a single debug message and > not an additional one for every inlined read/write? > -Chris > Urg... having some trouble with my email right now, so you have to deal with my gmail/webmail... 1. Yes, but I was lazy. 2. People call force_wake_get() without actually specifying a register, so I didn't want to enforce people entering bogus info on those calls. > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx >
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
