On Wed, 04 May 2011 11:46:42 -0700, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > On Wed, 04 May 2011 19:28:35 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > wrote: > > > to simply mark the device as uninterruptible for the duration. > > > > The code now does the latter. > > I'm good with that plan during modesetting, the question is whether the > new users of this function should allow for interrupts.
The callers control whether that function is interruptible or not by setting a flag on the device. So far the only piece of code that we have allowed to run non-interruptible is the modesetting. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
