On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:47:12 +0800, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > > We were reading our 64-bit value in I915_READ64 and returning 32 bits > of it. The restoration of fence regs at resume then had a zero end > value, and the fence had no effect. > > Version 2: Split register access functions into per-size versions
This also helps silence sparse since it doesn't seem able to do compile-time constant propagation dead-code elimination. Minor, yet annoying, issue. Thanks, -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
