On 2010.10.28 10:50:04 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > The POSTING_READs you added are no-ops since they are all followed by a > read. The transconf should have the bpc in the register at this point or > else we should have bugged much earlier. The break-exec-wait condition is > still documented for gen6, augmented with an additional break-sempahore-wait > and obviously per-ring, but this is unrelated to the changelog. > > I've shrunk the patch to just the FDI portion, pushed to staging for > review.
Current drm-intel-staging still fails unfortunately.. > Let's try to keep patches as minimal as possible and addressing > a single issue. (I'm as guilty of violating that as anyone.) Mostly so > that we have a clear history of why/how the code works (and I don't break > it later). yeah, will do that, thanks for remind. -- Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
