[Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)

[Joe Touch]

Content changes are not allowed in AUTH48, but We just concluded WG last call. On Sep 27, 2024, at 8:43 AM, Templin (US), Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com> wrote:  > UDP options cannot currently be used for still larger sizes   Actually, there is an easy fix for this which can be added to the queue for AUTH48.   Fred   From: Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin=40boeing....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2024 8:19 AM To: to...@strayalpha.com Cc: Tim Chown <tim.ch...@jisc.ac.uk>; Internet Area <Int-area@ietf.org>; IPv6 List <i...@ietf.org>; tsvwg IETF list <ts...@ietf.org> Subject: [Int-area] Re: IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)   Hi Joe,   >That approach to UDP jumbo grams is incompatible with UDP options.   IP parcels and Advanced Jumbos per my drafts are compatible with UDP options for sizes up to ~64KB. UDP options cannot currently be used for still larger sizes, but I suspect it will be a long time before we have to worry about that.   Fred   From: to...@strayalpha.com <to...@strayalpha.com> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2024 8:13 AM To: Templin (US), Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com> Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>; Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com>; Tim Chown <tim.ch...@jisc.ac.uk>; Internet Area <Int-area@ietf.org>; IPv6 List <i...@ietf.org>; tsvwg IETF list <ts...@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Int-area] IP Parcels and Advanced Jumbos (AJs)   EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments.     On Sep 27, 2024, at 7:58 AM, Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin=40boeing....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:   Indeed. But if sendmsg() and recvmsg() can and do generate RFC2675 packets, it means that any discussion of obsoleting RFC2675 should be off the table. No one that I know of has suggested obsoleting RFC2675 - my documents do not say "obsoletes" (nor even "updates”).   That approach to UDP jumbo grams is incompatible with UDP options.    And yes, there was a proposal to move that RFC to historic:   Jones, T., G. Fairhurst, "Change Status of RFC 2675 to Historic," draft-jones-6man-historic-rfc2675, May 2019.   We COULD have a new option with a longer length, but that’s not in our baseline draft.   Joe

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org