Hi,

I’ve just updated the writeup to track the discussion about section 2.4.
This can be found in bullet 5  of the writeup: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis/shepherdwriteup/

Ciao

L.


> On Sep 14, 2023, at 15:09, Luigi IANNONE <luigi.iann...@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Int-area <int-area-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Donald Eastlake
>> Sent: Wednesday, 13 September 2023 20:21
>> To: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyn...@cisco.com>
>> Cc: int-area@ietf.org; c...@ietf.org; Murray S. Kucherawy
>> <superu...@gmail.com>; Francesca Palombini
>> <francesca.palomb...@ericsson.com>; draft-ietf-intarea-
>> rfc7042bis....@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Int-area] The CBOR section of draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis...
>> 
>> 
>>> I welcome feedback from the community on this question: should section
>> 2.4 be in draft-ietf-intarea-rfc7042bis ?
>> 
>> I would point out that this was discussed in the CBOR WG. See, in particular
>> the thread starting at
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/I49hlrHka1BUPAq8oCtO77xElvc/
>> including the message at
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/h2FGrQ7Uw0PX4NdHO7Rn07rCb
>> tI/
>> which indicates that it was decided "to leave Ethernet tags for Donald's
>> rfc7042bis".
>> 
> 
> [LI] Don, thanks for these links. I will put them in the shepherd's write-up 
> once this thread is over. I think is important information worth to be added.
> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to