Op 13 sep. 2023 om 20:22 heeft Donald Eastlake <d3e...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> Although, as I recall, in that case the separate draft to > specify them was already in progress when reference to that draft was > added to RFC 7042 (actually draft rfc5342bis). Yes. > My main concern is that rfc7042bis would be slowed down by making the > specification of the tags a separate draft referenced from rfc7042bis. Given that 7042bis is almost certainly not the final word on the general subject of IEEE parameters in the IETF, it is surely an option to leave the 7042bis treatment of CBOR encodings as-is for now and defer replacement with a reference until a future time when a document to reference actually exists. I don't see much benefit to the consumers of any of this information to start that target document now and hold up 7042bis until it is ready. I agree it's possible that a document to reference could be constructed quite quickly, but I think it's fair to say that it's also possible that it could get held up for any number of non-controversial reasons. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
