Yes, that is fair Dino - I should have been more respectful in addressing Tom's points. I will try to do better from my side of things.
Thanks - Fred > -----Original Message----- > From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farina...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2021 6:36 AM > To: Templin (US), Fred L <fred.l.temp...@boeing.com> > Cc: Tom Herbert <t...@herbertland.com>; int-area@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Int-area] IP parcels > > EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments. > > > > > Tom, reading your message makes me think you have not read my drafts. The > > answers to the perceived issues you are raising are all there. I do not see > > anything > > new in what you are saying to make me believe otherwise. > > So there is a lot of email on this list where folks reference documents (and > indicate - just go read the document). No one actually writes > down (briefly) how things work in email messages. To read documents, in there > full entirety, as well as the references those documents > make, takes hours. Most reviewers don't have the time for every author that > wants specs reviewed to put this amount of time in. > > I would suggest that people inline write *briefly* how something works. If > you want a quality exchange of feedback, put the meat of the > design in email. If you can't explain it in two sentences, the design is too > complicated. > > This email response is not referring to you Fred. I am just making a general > comment. > > Dino _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
