On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:37:28AM +1100, Bron Gondwana wrote: > > > > If they are thinking that the example in the RFC is the specification, they > > are > > not correct. The IMAP server responses to determine completion of the > > EXPUNGE > > command are "OK" for a completed EXPUNGE, "NO" for a failure, and "BAD for > > unknown > > command or invalid arguments. Everything after those words are not germane > > to > > whether or not the command completed. The tag is what links the OK to the > > EXPUNGE > > command and not the "EXPUNGE completed". Sigh, they had it right and now it > > is > > broken. > > Actually, the ImapTest command complained about this too: > > http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest > > >From RFC3501: > > response-tagged = tag SP resp-cond-state CRLF > > > resp-cond-state = ("OK" / "NO" / "BAD") SP resp-text > ; Status condition > > resp-text = ["[" resp-text-code "]" SP] text > > text = 1*TEXT-CHAR > > So the exact text after the OK response doesn't matter, but it MUST be SP > followed by at least 1 TEXT-CHAR. > > This is pretty easy to patch in 2.3.x if you're forced to remain there for > reasons. It is, of course, fixed in later versions. > > Bron. >
Hi Bron, I don't suppose you have a patch? If not, I will work one up. Regards, Ken ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
