Dear Matthew and Nagaraj, thank you very much for the references. I'll send
th to May friend right away.

B.w.
Adriano



*Prof. Dr. Adriano Aprigliano*
Língua e Literatura Sânscrita
Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
Universidade de São Paulo

Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 403 CEP: 05508-900
Cidade Universitária, São Paulo - SP / Brasil
[email protected]
Gabinete 18, fone: 3091-4931
+5511954675747

Em ter., 5 de mai. de 2026 05:46, Nagaraj Paturi <[email protected]>
escreveu:

> I dealt with this in my MPhil dissertation (1986, University of Hyderabad)
> . It was written in Telugu.
>
> I was applying the Paninian approach to case /kaaraka as delineated in  
> Sādhanasamuddeśa
> of  Vakyapadiya of  Bhartrhari.
>
> Usually , Sambandha , the genitive / possessive case is presented as
> denoted by the 6th case marker. But this is not listed among the
> conventionally listed six kaarakas.
>
> But interestingly , Bhartrhari treats this as a kaaraka.
>
> sāmānyaṃ kārakaṃ tasya saptādyā bhedayonayaḥ /
> ṣaṭ karmākhyādibhedena śeṣabhedas tu saptamī // BVaky_3,7.44 //
>
> ( copied from the GRETIL website)
>
> Sādhanasamuddeśa of  Vakyapadiya of  Bhartrhari , after this verse has
> sections each called  adhikāra dedicated to different kaarakas.
>
> śeṣa , 'the remainder' is dealt in  śeṣādhikāraḥ
>
> [atha śeṣādhikāraḥ]
> saṃbandhaḥ kārakebhyo 'nyaḥ kriyākārakapūrvakaḥ /
> śrutāyām aśrutāyāṃ vā kriyāyāṃ so 'bhidhīyate // BVaky_3,7.156 //
> dviṣṭho 'py asau parārthatvād guṇeṣu vyatiricyate /
> tatrābhidhīyamānaḥ san pradhāne 'py upayujyate // BVaky_3,7.157 //
> nimittaniyamaḥ śabdāt saṃbandhasya na gṛhyate /
> karmapravacanīyais tu sa viśeṣo 'varudhyate // BVaky_3,7.158 //
> sādhanair vyapadiṣṭe ca śrūyamāṇakriye punaḥ /
> proktā pratipadaṃ ṣaṣṭhī samāsasya nivṛttaye // BVaky_3,7.159 //
> niṣṭhāyāṃ karmaviṣayā ṣaṣthī ca pratiṣidhyate /
> śeṣalakṣaṇayā ṣaṣṭhyā samāsastatra neṣyate // BVaky_3,7.160 //
> anyena vyapadiṣṭasya yasyānyatropajāyate /
> vyatirekaḥ sa dharmau dvau labhate viṣayāntare // BVaky_3,7.161 //
> prādhānyaṃ svaguṇe labdhvā pradhāne yāti śeṣatām /
> sahayoge svayoge 'taḥ pradhānatvaṃ na hīyate // BVaky_3,7.162 //
> [iti śeṣādhikāraḥ]
>
> ( copied from the GRETIL website)
>
> Here, he, very clearly, categorizes sambandha as a kaaraka
>
> in
>
> saṃbandhaḥ kārakebhyo 'nyaḥ kriyākārakapūrvakaḥ /
> śrutāyām aśrutāyāṃ vā kriyāyāṃ so 'bhidhīyate // BVaky_3,7.156 //
>
>  Deriving from  śrutāyām aśrutāyāṃ vā kriyāyāṃ , I identified  śrutakriyā
> and aśrutakriyā as terms and concepts and under the influence of
> Chomskyan ideas , I translated them as ground structure verb and deep
> structure verb respectively.
>
> I compared Fillmore's analysis of Genitive in The Case for Case
> https://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~syntax-circle/syntax-group/spr08/fillmore.pdf
>
>
> to this approach.
>
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2026 at 12:43 PM Matthew Kapstein via INDOLOGY <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> PS. Of course, that would be more oriented to current linguistic
>> approaches than to what the traditional grammars have to say.
>>
>>
>> Matthew T. Kapstein
>> Professor emeritus
>> Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, Paris
>>
>> Associate
>> The University of Chicago Divinity School
>>
>> Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
>>
>> https://ephe.academia.edu/MatthewKapstein
>>
>> https://vajrabookshop.com/product/the-life-and-work-of-auleshi/
>>
>>
>> https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501716218/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-i/#bookTabs=1
>>
>>
>> https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501771255/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-ii/#bookTabs=1
>>
>> https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/60949
>>
>>
>> Sent from Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home> for iOS.
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> On Tuesday, 05/05/26 at 10:10 Matthew Kapstein <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Adriano,
>>
>> I don’t have a copy on hand to check, but it may be useful to consult
>> Colin Masica, The Indo-Aryan Languages.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>> Matthew T. Kapstein
>> Professor emeritus
>> Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, PSL Research University, Paris
>>
>> Associate
>> The University of Chicago Divinity School
>>
>> Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences
>>
>> https://ephe.academia.edu/MatthewKapstein
>>
>> https://vajrabookshop.com/product/the-life-and-work-of-auleshi/
>>
>>
>> https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501716218/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-i/#bookTabs=1
>>
>>
>> https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9781501771255/tibetan-manuscripts-and-early-printed-books-volume-ii/#bookTabs=1
>>
>> https://brill.com/edcollbook/title/60949
>>
>>
>> Sent from Proton Mail <https://proton.me/mail/home> for iOS.
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> On Monday, 05/04/26 at 15:21 Adriano Aprigliano via INDOLOGY <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> A linguist friend asks me for references "that synthesize the Indian
>> grammatical tradition(s) analysis of possessive/genitive constructions".
>>
>> Does anyone have suggestions?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Adriano
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Prof. Dr. Adriano Aprigliano*
>> Língua e Literatura Sânscrita
>> Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas
>> Universidade de São Paulo
>>
>> Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 403
>> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/Av.+Prof.+Luciano+Gualberto,+403?entry=gmail&source=g>
>> CEP: 05508-900
>> Cidade Universitária, São Paulo - SP / Brasil
>> [email protected]
>> Gabinete 18, fone: 3091-4931
>> +5511954675747
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> INDOLOGY mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
>>
>
>
> --
> Nagaraj Paturi
> Hyderabad, Telangana-500044
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
INDOLOGY mailing list
[email protected]
https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology

Reply via email to