I also bought one, just last week, but do not have any disks yet, so no testing.
Which disk-mode did you select in BIOS? I remember there were three: IDE-compatible, RAID, and AHCI. The latter one should be the choice. Regards, -- Dipl.-Ing(BA) Frank Scheffler Managing Consultant / BU Manager Provisioning Phone: +49 (700) 5280 5280 Fax: +49 (700) 5280 5290 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.novatec-gmbh.de NovaTec Ingenieure für neue Informationstechnologien GmbH Dieselstrasse 18/1 - D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Waldenbuch Handelsregister: Stuttgart HRB 244435 Geschäftsführer: Hans-Dieter Brenner Michael Schuchart Albrecht Stäbler -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of soren Sent: Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2010 08:25 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] Atom based board, and experiences? > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 6:46 AM, soren > > Did you have a chance to diagnose the performance > problem? I kinda > suspect Atom's clock is maxed out there. Unless your > old board also use Atom? I'm pretty sure that's not the problem. My old Intel DP35DP was getting very nice performance with a Celeron E1200 1.6Ghz CPU, which isn't too much different than the SuperMicro's 1.66Ghz Atom. Both boards use the same ICH9R southbridge to drive SATA. Since I'm just writing a bunch of zeroes directly to disk without dedup or compression, neither board is using much CPU. And yet the Supermicro board is much slower. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
