On 13 Dec 2009, at 15:04, Jürgen Keil wrote:

>> All that's in system-hal:default.log is:
>> 
>> [ Dec 13 11:03:52 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/svc-hal start"). ]
>> hal failed to start: error 2
>> [ Dec 13 11:09:11 Method "start" exited with status 95. ]
> 
> Hmm, there is a 250 second timeout in hald, function
> parent_wait_for_child();  hald should exit with exit code 2
> when hald's subprocesses don't start up in a timely manner.
> 
> Not sure why you get a failure after ~ 320 seconds...

I thought the large time difference was interesting too.

>> An "svcadm clear hal" seems to fix things, but it
>> obviously shouldn't be failing in the first place.
> 
> What kind of hot pluggable / removable media devices
> are connected to this system?
> 
> USB? Firewire?  Flash memory sticks?  Flash memory reader?
> HDD? Optical devices?
> 
> Is there a PS/2 floppy device configured / connected to
> this system?

This is a VM running inside VMware Fusion. The only devices accessible to the 
VM were audio and an emulated serial port (used for capturing printer output, I 
think), and an emulated e1000g using DHCP.

The host wasn't logging anything odd around this time. The guest logged one 
error and a warning during the 320 seconds:

11:09:02 in.ndpd[470]: [ID 801587 daemon.error] fork: Resource temporarily 
unavailable
11:09:03 svc.startd[9]: [ID 122153 daemon.warning] 
svc:/network/routing/ndp:default: Method or service exist timed out.  Killing 
contract 65
11:09:05 last message repeated 1 time
11:09:10 svc.startd[9]: [ID 632263 daemon.warning] 
svc:/network/routing/ndp:default: Method "/lib/svc/method/svc-ndp" failed due 
to signal KILL.

Then the failure of svc-hal is logged. The errors re: fork and ndp has been 
present in all 12x builds, perhaps earlier ones. It seems odd for memory to be 
an issue when slightly later on X and GNOME is able to start up.

Cheers,

Chris
_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to