David Orman wrote: > Maybe joe + something equivalent to vim-minimal on Redhat Enterprise > Linux. If people want full functionality, then they can pull in "full" > vim. I'm with Andrew on the "no x required" bit. I've met a few people > who do set up text-only systems who hate vi/vim, and thus can barely get > along in it. It sounds like joe is a good compromise, I read up on > 'jmacs' and it sounds like it'll fill the emacs gap, without taking up > all the space. >
Not to be a wet blanket (too much), but a prerequisite for any other editor (or any other community software) making it into the 2008.11 live CD is that it be integrated into the SFW[1] (or other appropriate) consolidation so that it will have been vetted to meet the redistributability requirements and be capable of being supported by Sun's support organization. If nobody picks up the ball and does that for the various editors you're all fans of, there's nothing to discuss. Dave [1] http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/sfwnv/ _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
