Dave Miner wrote: > Harry Lu wrote: > >> On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 14:53 -0400, Dave Miner wrote: >> >>> As we all know, the live CD has grown quite a bit since the 2008.05 >>> release. I've spent some time analyzing how we're using the space and >>> where the growth between build 86 and build 94 occurred, and worked up >>> some recommendations. >>> >>> The analysis data is now posted at: >>> >>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/cd_space/ >>> >>> The recommendations are posted at: >>> >>> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/cd_recommendations/ >>> >>> >> I saw SUWNgnome-pilot and SUNWpilot-link are planed to be removed, but >> they are run time dependency of SUNWevolution. >> >> > > Sigh. At least they're small. Is there any reason they necessarily > have to be dependencies of Evolution? In other words, is this a design > dependency or merely the way we configure our build of Evolution? > I would say it is a design dependency. Evolution depends on them to do Addressbook/Calendar sync with Palm devices. If you really want to remove sth. from Evolution packages, I would suggest you to remove SUNWevolution-jescs and SUNWevolution-exchange. They are Evolution connectors to our Sun Calendar server and MS exchange server.
This is just from my developer's view. Maybe marketing people won't agree. Harry > Dave > _______________________________________________ > indiana-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss > _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
