2008/7/3 Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Praveen Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Shawn Walker wrote: >> >>> On 03/07/2008, Praveen Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I am running OpenSolaris 2008.05 snv_91 (2008.05 -> snv_89 -> snv_91). >>>> Out of curiosity I just ran 'pkg verify'. Interestingly, it is >>>> complaining[1] about few things. Does it mean that my image is screwed >>>> up? Is there a way to fix the errors that it complained about? >>>> >>>> 1 - http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/1061685 >>> >>> Interesting. Can you try running it again with "pfexec pkg verify"? >> >> How did I forget about pfexec! Not much differences[2] with it though. >> Should I report about this to pkg-discuss? >> >> 2 - http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/1061746 > > The python bits, considering the specific files affected (IPS, bits > used by IPS, thus things run as root), smell similar to 6469243. > Perhaps IPS not preserving the timestamps, causing a recompile (as there)?
Alright, the pyc files issues should have been resolved by this bug: 1100 .pyc files are not sufficiently advanced (in time) Bug 6469243 is definitely, possibly related. The browserconfig.properties is a known bug: 1460 browserconfig.properties doesn't verify on RC2 The permission denied traceback is a known bug: 1467 pkg verify without permission to read all files ends in traceback -- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
