2008/7/3 Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Praveen Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Shawn Walker wrote: >> >>> On 03/07/2008, Praveen Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I am running OpenSolaris 2008.05 snv_91 (2008.05 -> snv_89 -> snv_91). >>>> Out of curiosity I just ran 'pkg verify'. Interestingly, it is >>>> complaining[1] about few things. Does it mean that my image is screwed >>>> up? Is there a way to fix the errors that it complained about? >>>> >>>> 1 - http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/1061685 >>> >>> Interesting. Can you try running it again with "pfexec pkg verify"? >> >> How did I forget about pfexec! Not much differences[2] with it though. >> Should I report about this to pkg-discuss? >> >> 2 - http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/1061746 > > The python bits, considering the specific files affected (IPS, bits > used by IPS, thus things run as root), smell similar to 6469243. > Perhaps IPS not preserving the timestamps, causing a recompile (as there)?
After looking at this further, I agree with Rich. The pyc bits look to be due to bug 6469243 and can be safely ignored (very likely). ips does preserve timestamps afaik, so that shouldn't be the cause. As for the "entry not present" and permissions errors, I can't say what is causing those yet. -- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
