First, my complements to the Indiana team!!!  I took the very first 
developer preview for a spin back when it came out.  I then took a break 
from Indiana for a while.  Recently I came back for another look.  I think 
I've just about convinced myself to switch my home desktop box from Linux 
to OpenSolaris.  And, I've been a Linux user since the 1.xx kernel days, 
so that takes a lot of convincing.

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Shawn Walker wrote:

> 2008/6/22 Juan Miguel Bernal Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I couldn't install IPSgawk from IPS blastwave repository but I could 
>> install: SUNWgcc, SUNWgmake, SUNWxorg-headers. This is the error 
>> message:
>>
>> $ pfexec pkg install IPSgawk
>> pkg: no package matching 'IPSgawk' could be found in current catalog
>>     suggest relaxing pattern, refreshing and/or examining catalogs
>> pkg: install failed: Unable to assemble image plan.
>
> Try: "pkg install pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

I've recently encountered a similar issue.  Is this a snv_91 issue?  I 
currently have the following authorities:

AUTHORITY                           URL
opensolaris.org (preferred)         http://pkg.opensolaris.org:80/
blastwave.org                       http://blastwave.network.com:10000/

Before upgrading to svn_91 I could install packages from BlastWave, using 
GNU screen as an example, with just:

     pkg install IPSscrn

Since upgrading, I have to use the full FMRI complete with authority 
name, such as:

     pkg install pkg://blastwave.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yet, the short version of the name works with:

     pkg info -r IPSscrn

Is requiring the full FMRI when installing intentional or is this a 
problem with the latest version of ips?




Kevin
http://www.RawFedDogs.net
http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org
Bruceville, TX

Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
Longum iter est per praecepta, breve et efficax per exempla!!!

_______________________________________________
indiana-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

Reply via email to