On 06.02.2013 19:43, Brendan Oakley wrote:
I am seeing a pattern in these discussions. I don't want to point
fingers, but I would respectfully and gently suggest that the current
approach to answering questions and comments be reconsidered. There
are two sides to every story, and development theory and the real
world can sometimes be at odds.

That's somewhat generic.

That requires thoughtful
reconciliation, not just dismissal. The purpose of this software is
live deployment for broad user consumption, after all, isn't it?

As it currently stand, the project currently can only support a user base which knows how to google, knows how to ask questions on a mailing list or how to participate on a bug tracker, or submits patches.

The signature thing has been discussed over and over, and while I am not happy with the current state (not showing but appending signatures)
I am convinced that none of the solutions presented is any better.

--
Ralf Lang
Linux Consultant / Developer
Tel.: +49-170-6381563
Mail: l...@b1-systems.de
B1 Systems GmbH
Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg / http://www.b1-systems.de
GF: Ralph Dehner / Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537
--
imp mailing list
Frequently Asked Questions: http://wiki.horde.org/FAQ
To unsubscribe, mail: imp-unsubscr...@lists.horde.org

Reply via email to